Hormasji "Homi" Maneckji Seervai — was an Indian eminent jurist , lawyer and author. Seervai was born on 5 December in Bombay present-day Mumbai in a middle class Parsi family. He matriculated from Bhada New High School, Mumbai and in joined Elphinstone College , Bombay from where he graduated with a first class degree in philosophy. He received his law degree from Government Law College, Mumbai. Seervai was called to the bar in
|Genre:||Health and Food|
|Published (Last):||24 August 2013|
|PDF File Size:||20.20 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.95 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Hormasji "Homi" Maneckji Seervai — was an Indian eminent jurist , lawyer and author. Seervai was born on 5 December in Bombay present-day Mumbai in a middle class Parsi family.
He matriculated from Bhada New High School, Mumbai and in joined Elphinstone College , Bombay from where he graduated with a first class degree in philosophy. He received his law degree from Government Law College, Mumbai. Seervai was called to the bar in During those years, he was offered various other positions in the Indian judicial system, including a seat on the Indian Supreme Court and as Attorney General for India.
He declined these positions preferring to contribute through critical analysis of higher court judgements. He had an effortless command of the English language and its classics. His first chance in the Supreme Court of India arose in a defence of the Government of Bombay's decision to ban prize competitions, in the nature of lotteries.
Seervai's argument was rewarded with spectacular success. The judgments and orders of the Bombay courts were unanimously set aside with costs. Those who are familiar with the legal profession know that his 3 volume work on Constitutional Law is the finest work on the subject and if an Indian advocate is well versed in it, he is automatically considered worthy of respect.
Seervai was a man above all dedicated to truth and justice. This is precisely why he earned the respect of his colleagues, clients and readers alike. In many respects, Seervai, the man, was greater than Seervai, the lawyer, but the two characters were inextricably mixed, making him the most respected person in law and giving him that indefinable eminence over several lawyers of his day who were reputed to be clever and more astute than he was.
Seervai is best known for his analysis, the Constitutional Law of India — a Critical Commentary. This work contributed significantly to Kesavananda Bharati vs. The State of Kerala , his most famous case, which led to the development of the " Basic structure doctrine", which inhibits politically motivated changes to the Constitution of India. Perhaps, its full repercussions have not yet completely been understood, and it is the defining and distinguishing part of democracy under the written constitution vs.
The decision established that a legislature, elected for the legislative process, does not have the ability to amend the basic structure of the constitution. That in itself indicates a departure from the British Westminster democracy, where the unwritten constitution can be amended at will by the British parliament, which is the ultimate sovereign. The Indian Parliament, however, cannot change the basic structure of the Indian constitution and the same principle is championed in later cases by the Supreme Court of India.
Seervai's impact on defining the limits of parliamentary sovereignty and in declaring the constitution supreme has been great for the entire subcontinent and today it has become an accepted principle that has been upheld by the Supreme Court of Pakistan as well. Recognition of his eminence came in many ways. He was offered judgeship of the Supreme Court twice.
Each time he declined it. He was conferred the Padma Vibhushan in In , the British Academy elected Seervai its Corresponding Fellow, a distinction reserved for scholars of the highest academic distinction. Also in , he was awarded the Dadabhai Naoroji Prize. Lord Denning, the doyen of all judges said, "He was a great personality and one of the most learned I have met.
Declining the office with thanks, he wrote in his own hand to the Law Minister that the best contribution that he could make to the law was not to appear in Court but to "embody in successive editions of his book the correct judicial interpretation of the Constitution". One cannot think of any lawyer in the world declining such a high office for the sake of writing a scholarly thesis. He argued that it was the latent bias on the part of Indian National Congress leadership which resulted in partition.
It is a painstakingly accurate exercise of sifting through the Transfer of Power Papers, apart from dozens of other books on the subject of Partition, after which like a true jurist, Mr. Seervai has given his verdict and it is an interesting verdict but also a journey towards discovering the truth. The journey, Seervai says, started for Rajmohan Gandhi with his fascinating inquiry into the life of Mahomed Ali Jinnah in which the author did not shy away from criticising his famous grandfather, Mohandas Gandhi, for introducing religion into politics and for refusing to accommodate the Muslims to share power.
Rajmohan Gandhi's thesis was considerably developed by Seervai, whose in-depth research and study on the subject came to the conclusion that Congress, rather than Jinnah, was primarily responsible for Partition by not accepting parity for Hindus and Muslims and other safeguards for Muslim interests.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. Learn how and when to remove these template messages. This article relies too much on references to primary sources. Please improve this by adding secondary or tertiary sources. March Learn how and when to remove this template message. This article relies largely or entirely on a single source.
Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help improve this article by introducing citations to additional sources.
This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification. Please help by adding reliable sources. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately , especially if potentially libelous or harmful.
Mumbai , Maharashtra, India. Universal Law Publishing. Retrieved 16 September Mumbai: High Court of Australia. Archived from the original PDF on 16 September Chamarbaugwala - SCR ".
Supreme Court of India. University Law Online. Archived from the original on 17 March Padma Vibhushan award recipients. Balamuralikrishna T. Pattammal K. Shantaram Shivkumar Sharma Umayalpuram K. Sivaraman M. Subbulakshmi K. Dhar Jyotindra Nath Dixit M. Gill Hafiz Mohamad Ibrahim H. Krishnamurthy P. Rajeswar C. Krishnaswamy Rao Pattadakal Venkanna R. Rao V.
Narayan P. Parameswaran Amrita Pritam K. Raj C. Jasbir Singh Bajaj B. Goyal Purshotam Lal A. Lakshmanaswami Mudaliar S. Sunderlal Bahuguna B. Banerji Mirza Hameedullah Beg P. Ranga Ravi Narayana Reddy Y. Sangma M. Patel Venkatraman Ramakrishnan K. Ramanathan Raja Ramanna C. Rao C. Sreedharan M. Srinivasan George Sudarshan M. Narayana Murthy M. Reddy J. Tata Ratan Tata.
Hormasji Maneckji Seervai
SC acquisition action administration Amendment of article appeal appointed authority Beg C. Bhagwati Chandrachud Charan Singh Chief Justice choses in action citizens civil clause Commission conferred by Art Conseil d'Etat considered Constitution contempt Council Court held decided decision defence deprived Desai discussion election enacted enforcement entry executive exercise fact federal freedom fundamental rights G. Act Gandhi Government of India ground Habeas Corpus High Court ibid inserted italics supplied Jagjivan Ram Janata Party judges judicial judiciary jurisdiction Karnataka Kerala Krishna Iyer Legislature Lord Denning majority judgments mala fide matter ment necessary observed offence opinion Parliament personal liberty petition political President preventive detention Prime Minister principle proceedings Proclamation of Emergency promissory estoppel provisions punishment question Rajasthan reasons referred religion rights conferred rule Secondly secure Seervai Shah sub-clause submitted Supreme Court Tamil Nadu territory of India tion Union validity violate Art void words writ. Seervai N. Table of Cases Cited.