They call it a "mass torte," but it can also go by the name "mass joinder," or "multi-plaintif," or whatever other term d'art it might be using tomorrow, but no matter what it's called, the person calling to tell you Continue reading. Listen to Podcasts. When you need intelligent help with a reverse mortgage, you want to contact the Reverse Mortgage Intelligence Team at HighTech Lending. We can analyze your situation and get you answers that you can depend on. We always work in your best interests, which is why our clients are also our friends.
|Published (Last):||21 October 2007|
|PDF File Size:||1.83 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.27 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
BANK, N. The Havens for the money laundering schemes — and certain of the names and places of these entities — are located in such venues as Switzerland, the Isle of Man, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Cypress and entities controlled by governments adverse to the interests of the United States Sanctions and Embargo Act against Iran, and are also identified in both the United Nations and the U.
Many of these entities have already been personally served with summons and process of the complaint during the last six months. The case further alleges that through these obscure foreign companies, Bank of America, J.
This District Court Complaint — maintained by Spire Law Group, LLP — is the only lawsuit in the world listing as Defendants the Banksters, let alone serving all of such Banksters with legal process and therefore forcing them to finally answer the charges in court.
James N. What has the Administration done to recover back these trillions of dollars, since April, when this complaint was first filed? Attorney General? What exactly does Timothy Geitner do for a living, other than preside over the laundering and racketeering of trillions of dollars? Why has no Bankster been sued or indicted by any of the foregoing public officials, while they concurrently steal trillions of dollars and transfer them to Luxembourg? The Firm is at the front lines litigating against government officials, banks, defunct loan pools, and now the very offshore entities where the corruption was enabled and perpetrated.
The Initial Money………………………………. While the defendants — and each of them — were able to hide the amounts of money and manner of the conspiratorial taking of money for individual profit and gain over the past decade due to various corrupt practices of officials acting far outside the course and scope of their employment, the public discourse is now replete with proof of the foregoing ponzi and racketeering schemes and concomitant money laundering enterprise by all Defendants and in each case for personal gain using entities that are Defendants herein and that also were or are fronts for drug cartels, terrorist groups or other unsourced money transferors and transferees violative of the United States Patriot Act, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act and other State and Federal laws.
An asset freeze order pending appointment of an independent receiver, is required in order to safeguard and return the assets to the United States of America, Plaintiffs and other rightful owners thereto. Included among the lawless activities of the Defendants has been the breaking and entering into homes of American citizens and stripping such homes of jewelry, fixtures, appliances and anything of value, without court order or approval, and with full knowledge that no court or legislative system could stop pillaging and plundering done with such speed, such detailed intention and such Viking-like efficiency.
Bush nor George W. The United States of America and its citizens — plaintiffs herein and other victims similarly situated — require the issuance of broad injunctive relief to prevent any further theft and looting absent judicial review by one experienced federal judge acting with full jurisdictional authority as well as with knowledge gained from and audited by an independent and experienced court-appointed receiver. This Court has jurisdiction over the claims against each of the Defendants by way of 18 U.
Venue is proper in this judicial district under 18 U. Venue is also proper in this judicial district under 18 U. All transactions sued upon herein were transactions occurring exclusively in interstate and then international commerce.
Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to State and Federal law, as all Defendants are either domiciled in New York city, or they regularly conduct business there and avail themselves of the benefits and protections of New York law there.
Furthermore, venue is proper because all defendants agreed and co-conspired to the fraudulent transfers and subsequent transfers arising out of the tortious activity committed in the State of New York described herein.
Because the scheme of the Defendants has been unraveled and Defendants have been caught red handed, this Court is empowered to now take action that will eliminate all woes for both Plaintiffs on a micro-economic basis and for involuntary plaintiff the United States of America on a macro-economic basis.
The members of the Bankster Enterprise are separated in this First Amended Complaint into three groups. Apart from all Defendants set forth herein, Exhibit A hereto lists subsequent transferee Defendants affiliated with all Defendants herein and which may be added as Doe defendants in the future should sufficient information exist to do so.
Furthermore, the actual acts and omissions of each Defendant individually — and in conspiracy with the other Defendants — are expressly set forth in this Section IV. All Defendants set forth herein acted with full knowledge that they were and are engaged in the continuing theft, laundering, misappropriation, racketeering of trillions of dollars emanating from New York City and constituting, among other things, mail fraud, wire fraud, securities fraud and TARP fraud, tax fraud as well as violations of other State and Federal laws set forth herein.
To the extent the Defendant is a governmental official, they have been named in their individual capacity and each government official named herein has directed monies of American citizens into the pockets of themselves and the other Defendants set forth herein.
The patent applications make undisputed the bad-intentions of the Defendants, because they lay out the money laundering and ponzi schemes with specificity prior to the first dollar being unlawfully taken from any of the Plaintiffs or American citizens.
There is no worth or value to a patent application requesting approval of a system for transferring money, yet these patent applications supported written contracts in the hundreds of dollars approving the payment of billions of dollars amongst the various Defendants and each of them. Illegal Schemes of the Bankster Enterprise The schemes of the Defendants are a described in paragraphs 1 through 5 above and b expanded upon in the description below.
Indeed, the Defendants were so brazen in their theft, looting and governmental corruption that they have regularly, and in conspiracy with all other Defendants, fabricated evidence and then arresting lawyers who have sued them for such theft and corruption, only to then admit on witness stands in open courtrooms across the country that there is no evidence supporting their wild theories. The audacious conspiratorial schemes of the Defendants reach to the highest levels of Wall Street, Main Street and State and Federal governmental agencies.
Indeed, prior to the theft of their first dollar and their first dossier of private information of the Plaintiffs and other Americans, Defendants — and each of them in conspiracy with all other Defendants -applied to the United States Patent and Trademark Office seeking the approval of thousands of patents detailing complex schemes involving the movement of money, information and assets to secret entities whether located offshore or otherwise.
There is no worth or value to a patent application requesting approval of a system for transferring and laundering money and private information, yet these patent applications supported written contracts in the hundreds of millions of dollars approving the payment of billions of dollars amongst the various Defendants and each of them.
There was never an instance when any of the Defendants intended to or did in fact credit a payment of money received by any Plaintiff herein against any amount due and owing under any promissory note signed by any Plaintiff. Monies Laundered In the course of their ponzi scheme — and as a result of world market conditions — Defendant Bankster Enterprise comprised all of the National Banking Enterprises set forth below and certain of its individuals. At that time, members of the Enterprise had — as a general rule — only one kind of asset securing the money they had advanced, to wit: Land.
Like any ponzi scheme, they needed more money to operate and they did not have it ready. Public markets crashed and certain persons trading the derivatives of the scheme went out of business or were on the verge. An example of a Bankster Defendant who failed is Bear Stearns. At that time, representatives of the United States of America caused the U. Furthermore, the Defendants, and each of them, attempted to unlawfully profit from the turmoil while they sustained it.
Some of these monies were advanced under the socalled TARP programs and some of these monies were advanced sub silentio. They confronted the Defendants and were met with additional newly elected government officials and reconstituted corporate heads of Bankster Defendants.
Discovery is continuing. Plaintiffs will amend this complaint accordingly as additional corrupt members of the Holder-Dunn Group are located who have stolen money from the Fed whilst they fabricated evidence against those trying to stop them.
By this time, all Defendants were involved in a detailed way with the schemes described above and the involvement was active and with full knowledge of its illegality as set forth herein. This has resulted in numerous cases where the Holder-Dunn Group and their affiliates — or those acting on their behalf — have admitted to extrinsic fraud, suborning perjury, attempting to fix cases, fabricating evidence and directing the use of prosecutorial governmental resources in an unequal, vindictive and selective way in which innocent people and home owners nationwide have been targeted.
Far from being isolated as one example of unlawful conduct toward those on the enemies list, the Holder-Dunn Group has presided over the highest level of warrantless searches, seizures, wiretaps and creations of sham files and sham court filings and sham recordations and sham socalled phantom litigations, in the history of all United States administrations before them. As of the date of filing of this First Amended Complaint, the enemies list held by the Holder-Dunn Group, their affiliates and agents and representatives — and thus subject to the foregoing illegal behavior and obstruction of justice — have included but are not limted to : Among others, on information and belief, including in the federal enemies list supervised by the Holder-Dunn Group as set forth above are a Ruppert Mudock, b Roger Ales, c Fox News Network and their affiliates, agents and those acting on their behalf, d active members of various faith based organizations located within the jurisdictional purview of this Court in at least Brooklyn New York; and e active members of various faith based organizations located elsewhere in the United States e.
Fiedler, t Rush Limbaugh, q Tucker Carlson, r various organizations with agendas contrary to those of the Bankster Defendants as set forth in detail above, including the Daily Caller and Judicial Council Watcher and their affiliated entities.
This has devastated the Plaintiffs because the Holder-Dunn Group, et al. The New York Genesis of the Bankster Enterprise In addition to the detailed jurisdictional and venue oriented facts set forth above, the racketeering and money laundering scheme outlined in detail throughout this complaint had as its only epicenter: i.
The Initial Money On information and belief, the first money utilized in connection with the criminal RICO enterprise set forth above, was laundered and additional money added thereto, from and with the full use of all resources located at the physical location of the Federal Reserve situated at 33 Liberty Street NewYork, NY.
Continual Influx of RICO Enterprise Money All the monies involved or appertaining to the RICO enterprise set forth above — from and after its inception and up to and including the date of filing of this complaint — including, but not limited, terrorist money, monies to evade the Iranian Embargo Act, drug cartel money, unsourced money, and money utilized to evade taxes, was placed into or through the clearinghouse systems in New York including the Depositary Trust Corporation located at E.
Other Locations There are no other locations besides the New York venues set forth above, where the RICO and laundering schemes set forth herein were in fact conducted and implemented. This allowed persons in positions of power to fall victim of the kinds of corruption existing throughout human history.
Unfortunately, here, the level of corruption and concomitant theft was and continues to be unprecedented for the reasons set forth in detail above. All Defendants in this complaint acted in conspiracy, and as agent and assign and on behalf of, each other Defendant in this complaint to protect the privacy and secrecy of this Holder and Geroge Syndicate.
All Defendants in this complaint acted in conspiracy, and as agent and assign and on behalf of, each other Defendant in this complaint to protect the privacy and secrecy of this Sandor Samuel Affiliates syndicate. Because Mr. On information and belief, puppeteer Geitner received some of this money. On information and belief, one such Defendant receiving money under this Corzine-controlled syndicate is disgraced former Citigroup Chairman Defendant Vickram Pandit. On information and belief, another such Defendant receiving money under this Corzine controlled syndicate is disgraced former Bank of America Chairman Kenneth Lewis.
All Defendants in this complaint acted in conspiracy, and as agent and assign and on behalf of, each other Defendant in this complaint to protect the privacy and secrecy of The Corzine money grab. All Defendants in this complaint acted in conspiracy, and as agent and assign and on behalf of, each other Defendant in this complaint to protect the privacy and secrecy of The GGR operations set forth herein.
On information and belief, Defendants receiving money under this Geitner operation were and are Robert Rubin, Valerie Jarrett, Anita Dunn, Robert Bauer, persons resident in, or hailing from, Chicago and closely aligned with the Obama campaign. All Defendants in this complaint acted in conspiracy, and as agent and assign and on behalf of, each other Defendant in this complaint to protect the privacy and secrecy of The Geitner Syndicate.
Plaintiffs This Plaintiff shall be designated as Plaintiff No. AYALA is a resident of the State of California and had a mortgage loan that was originated or serviced by one of the Defendants herein. LILLY is a resident of the State of California and had a mortgage loan that was originated or serviced by one of the Defendants herein.
ZINK is a resident of the State of California and had a mortgage loan that was originated or serviced by one of the Defendants herein. VO is a resident of the State of California and had a mortgage loan that was originated or serviced by one of the Defendants herein. Each Plaintiff worked hard for these funds and earned them, paid state and federal taxes on them, and had the exclusive dominion and control over them.
The Defendants Through the wrongful conduct set forth in this complaint, the Defendants — and each of them — converted all of said funds and have continued the hiding and secreting of these funds from the period beginning on or about January 22, and continuing at all times thereafter.
At all times, the Defendants — and each of them, as they entered the conspiracy alleged herein — continued to hide and secrete the converted funds despite demands that they cease and desist from doing so by the Plaintiffs. This Defendant shall be designated as Defendant No. Defendant TODD TORR is a defendant who maintains residences across the United States, is an active member of the conspiracy set forth herein the epicenter of which is Manhattan, and is subject to jurisdiction in New York as a consequence.
EMC is an affiliate of Chase Bank. Defendant Servicers, either directly or through their agents, employees, and subsidiaries, have serviced tens of thousands of residential real estate loans in the State of New York.
This Defendant is fully subject to jurisdiction in this action pursuant to applicable law. Defendant J. This Defendant is fully subject to jurisdiction this action pursuant to applicable law. This Defendant shall be designated as Defendant No A is an Unknown Business Entity located in Brazil. Defendant U. Defendants, and each of them beginning in paragraph and concluding in paragraph 2,, are all entities of unknown form, a. At all times material hereto, the business of Defendants was operated through a common plan and scheme designed to conceal from Plaintiffs the material facts set forth below.
Such facts were also concealed from the public and from regulators, either directly or as successors-in-interest to the business acquired from others. Plaintiffs allege that each of the wrongful acts or omissions described below was performed either by each Defendant herein, named or unnamed, or ratified and adopted by each Defendant after its occurrence.
Further, those Defendants that did not actively perform the acts or omissions described in this Complaint did affirmatively aid and abet the other Defendants in the performance of such acts of omissions, before, during or after the fact. Finally, each Defendant herein, named or unnamed, did knowingly derive some form of profit or benefit from the acts and omissions described herein. Accordingly, each Defendant, named or unnamed, should be held liable for the acts and omissions of all other Defendants with respect to the causes of action set forth below.
The true names and capacities of the Defendants listed herein as DOES 2 through 1, are unknown to Plaintiffs who therefore sue these Defendants by such fictitious names. Each of the Defendants herein, named or unnamed, was the agent of each of the other Defendants herein, named or unnamed, and thereby participated in all of the wrongdoing set forth below. Thus, each such Defendant is responsible for the acts, events and concealment of every other such Defendant as set forth below.
Hi Everyone,. You may have seen the gruesome and sad murder of two children in NYC supposedly by their nanny. There is much more to the story. Leo and Lulu picture below were the children of Kevin and Marina Krim.
Rest here…. I agree…. Frank was instrumental in ushering the Wall Street bailout through Congress in And he, along with former Sen. Chris Dodd, have their names attached to a sweeping Wall Street reform bill passed through Congress and signed into law by President Obama in Here he is calling foul when he was one of those pushing to bail them out!